Poll results: Which coach(es) should be retained beyond 2014?

Tag: coaching changes


4Dec 2014
Uncategorized 7 comments

Poll results: Which coach(es) should be retained beyond 2014?

Roy Manning (image via Maizeandbluenews.com)

Leading up to last week’s game against Ohio State, I asked a question about which coach(es) should be retained after the season. Voters were allowed to pick multiple answers. Here are the results:

Roy Manning (cornerbacks): 51%

Greg Mattison (defensive coordinator/linebackers): 49%

Doug Nussmeier (offensive coordinator/quarterbacks): 18%

Mark Smith (defensive line): 18%

Fred Jackson (running backs): 7%

Dan Ferrigno (tight ends): 5%

Curt Mallory (safeties): 4%

Jeff Hecklinski (wide receivers/recruiting coordinator): 3%

Darrell Funk (offensive line): 2%

Brady Hoke (head coach): 0% (1 vote)

No coaches should be retained: 18%

Hoke has been canned, and defensive coordinator Greg Mattison reportedly cleared out his desk upon learning the news. So the 49% of people who wanted him back will be disappointed, and the one lonely soul who wanted Hoke to return is drinking a beer by himself. The other staff members could possibly be interviewed and retained, but it’s unusual to keep on more than one or two guys from a previous regime.

3Dec 2014
Uncategorized 16 comments

Coaching Candidate: Dan Mullen

Dan Mullen

Dan Mullen
Age:
 42
Current position: Mississippi State head coach
Head coaching experience: 46-30 at Mississippi State (2009-present)
History: Mullen was born in Pennsylvania, attended high school in New Hampshire, and played tight end at Ursinus College, a D-III school in Pennsylvania. He was Urban Meyer’s right-hand man as quarterbacks coach at Bowling Green, Utah, and Florida, serving as offensive coordinator at the latter. His charges have included Josh Harris at BGSU, Alex Smith at Utah, and both Chris Leak and Tim Tebow at Florida. Mullen now works with Dak Prescott, who was a 3-star and the #17 dual-threat quarterback coming out of high school and was a Heisman candidate for much of the season. Mississippi State is 10-2 this season, but Mullen has never lost fewer than 4 games in any year until now.
My thoughts: Mullen is a bit of a flash in the pan this year because of his team’s record; the 10-2 record looks nice right now, and he was undefeated through 9 games this year, but he’s consistently won between 7 and 9 games. He is in a bit of an unfair position at Mississippi State, however. He has to fight with Ole Miss inside the state, not to mention other big-time SEC programs that have been producing high-level NFL talent for several years (Florida, LSU, Alabama, etc.). Unfortunately for Mississippi State, they’re not a long-term destination and it would behoove Mullen to jump while the team is cresting, rather than waiting for a fall-off. With his roots in Pennsylvania and the northeast, he would probably do a solid job of recruiting in Big Ten country. .
Likelihood of coming to Michigan: Mullen has largely been devoid of scandal talk during his time at Mississippi State, until a couple weeks ago when he took away a scholarship offer from Chason Virgil and offered him a grayshirt opportunity instead. That ruffled some feathers, but Mullen is unable to comment publicly on the reason for pulling the scholarship (Virgil is now committed to SMU). That will be a small hurdle for Mullen to leap over if he gets hired elsewhere. Otherwise, he would seem to be a good fit. The Bulldogs have been consistent with running the ball, which Michigan fans would love. As I mentioned above, the time is now for him. If I were Michigan’s administration, he would be very high on my list.

My wish list:
1. Bob Stoops
2. Dan Mullen
3. Les Miles
4. Greg Schiano
5. Pat Narduzzi
6. Mike Shanahan

3Dec 2014
Uncategorized 9 comments

What does Michigan need?

I want that. (image via Lumberjocks)

In the wake of Brady Hoke’s firing, questions naturally arise about who could fill the head coaching role at Michigan. I am wading through that question in my Coaching Candidate posts (LINK), but it’s a huge question mark.

Here, though, I’ll try to adjust some things Michigan needs to do in the coming months, both with the coaching hire as well as the program itself. These items are in no particular order.

Jim Harbaugh. Okay, this is perhaps obvious, cliched at this point, and a little too singular for this list, but the hiring of Harbaugh would meet almost all of Michigan fans’ and administration’s expectations. Alumni and recruits are pining for this guy, he’s a proven winner at the college and NFL levels, he knows how to succeed at a high-level academic institution, his type of personnel is already in the program, etc.

Bring back some excitement. Hoke’s hiring in 2011 did not light the world on fire, even though he made a very good impact at his introductory press conference in January of that year. Now that the program is in a downward trend, the recruiting has fallen off a cliff (at least in 2015), donations and attendance are dropping, etc., the new coach needs to bring in some excitement. It doesn’t necessarily have to be a flashy hire, but the guy has to give fans, recruits, and players a shot in the arm.

Maintain Michigan’s academic standards. One of Rich Rodriguez’s failures was recruiting guys who were unable to hack it at Michigan. Especially in the 2010 class, he had numerous guys who didn’t qualify, got in trouble, or had academic issues otherwise. Hoke changed that trend, and while the program was on a downward trend, the character of the players is high overall and he was able to retain a large amount of his players. New University of Michigan president Mark Schlissel stresses academics, so anyone who puts academics on the back burner is going to clash with Schlissel.

Play nice with the media. Much like the media in New York City, the Ann Arbor and Detroit-area media will eat someone alive who makes mistakes. With a reputation for excellence in athletics and academics, Michigan has a relatively unique situation. Rich Rodriguez – with his West Virginia accent and salty on-field language/behavior – drew the ire of media figures, which combined with his losing to cause the Detroit Free Press  to launch a full scale investigation into how long Rodriguez was asking his players to stretch before practice. Hoke had his own issues, largely because he was much less open than Rodriguez and didn’t share any juicy information. A coach can get away with a lot if he’s winning, but a losing coach will find himself under an intimidating microscope. No coach will make 100% of the media happy, so he has to know how to walk the line.

Avoid scandals. To go along with the item above, a scandal is bad news in Ann Arbor. Jameis Winston cannot exist at Michigan. Johnny Manziel cannot exist at Michigan. Stretching for too long will get the sharks circling. Every college is going to have its share of behavior issues (Michigan has had Frank Clark, Will Hagerup, Brendan Gibbons, Darryl Stonum, etc.), but the fans and administration will require those players to be dealt with fairly, if not harshly.

Adjust to the personnel. Michigan is built to be a pro-style, multiple tight end, two-back offense. There are no dual-threat quarterbacks on the roster. There are few options for slot types of receivers that people like Rich Rodriguez and Urban Meyer have used. A new coach either needs to come in with the expectation of installing his offense slowly – and accepting some growing pains – or rolling with the current personnel and what they’re capable of doing. Defensively, Michigan has some flexibility with the way they have recruited. Unlike when Rodriguez was here, Michigan has guys who can play nose tackle and defensive end in a 3-man front, enough quality linebackers to run a 3-4, enough talent in the defensive backfield to play with five defensive backs, or the ability to continue running their 4-3 stuff.

A quarterback. Maybe Michigan’s quarterback of the future is already on the roster, or maybe he’s finishing up his senior year of high school. Current roster options are limited (Shane Morris and Russell Bellomy have combined to throw for 0 touchdowns and 9 interceptions, and Wilton Speight redshirted this past season). Either way, Michigan has arguably been without a “franchise” quarterback since 2007, when Chad Henne was in Ann Arbor. (Denard Robinson’s only genuinely good year at quarterback was in 2010, in my opinion.) There are certainly other factors at play, but it’s not a coincidence that Michigan has had a 46-42 record since Henne departed.

– Win. Winning cures everything. The sooner, the better. Brady Hoke’s 11-2 initial season earned him the 2014 season, in my opinion. If his records had been 8-5, 7-6, and 5-7, he probably wouldn’t have been given a fourth year.

2Dec 2014
Uncategorized 29 comments

Brady Hoke, Ex-Wolverine

This is the way I want to remember Brady Hoke.

As had been expected, Michigan chose to let Brady Hoke go on Tuesday afternoon. A team meeting was held at 3:00 p.m., where the 2014 team captains were announced before the news of the firing.

Hoke released a statement shortly after the news became public:

I feel very fortunate to have been an assistant and head coach at the University of Michigan. I will always support the University and this football program. This is a special place and one that Laura, Kelly, and I have enjoyed representing during our time in Ann Arbor. I want to thank all of the sons that played for our teams and appreciate the commitment that our coaches and support staff made to the program every day. I will miss the relationships that I’ve been fortunate enough to make within the university and community. I additionally appreciate all of the support that our fans, alumni, students, administration, and former players have provided our Michigan. I leave with fond memories of my time at Michigan. Thanks and Go Blue!

Hoke was hired in January 2011 (check out my introductory post on Hoke) after Rich Rodriguez was fired. Rodriguez was 15-22 from 2008-2010, incurred NCAA sanctions, and did not fit well with Michigan’s established administration, but he did have increasing win totals (3 in 2008, 5 in 2009, 7 in 2010) during his career. As for Hoke himself, he had gone 47-50 during his head coaching career with Ball State and San Diego State, taking those teams from 4-8 in his initial years to 12-1 and 9-4, respectively, in his final season at those schools. Despite the losing record, he was considered to be a coach who could build a program.

Bucking his own established trend, Hoke led Michigan to an 11-2 in his first year, beating Ohio State and winning the Sugar Bowl against Virginia Tech. He followed that up with an 8-5 year that ended in an Outback Bowl loss to South Carolina. The 2013 season saw Michigan fall to 7-6 with a loss to Kansas State in the Buffalo Wild Wings Bowl. The Wolverines completed a 5-7 season this past Saturday with a 42-28 loss to Ohio State, dropping him to 1-3 against the Buckeyes – not to mention 1-3 against the intrastate rival Michigan State Spartans. Hoke finishes his Michigan career with a 31-20 overall record and at 18-14 in the Big Ten. That includes records of 12-13 and 6-10, respectively, over the past two seasons.

As for the reasons Hoke was fired, the problems were multiple. One of the biggest symptoms was the failure to develop a solid quarterback. Hoke inherited Denard Robinson in 2011, and while Robinson won a lot of games and had pretty good overall numbers, he regressed in the passing game. Due to injury, Robinson and Devin Gardner split time in 2012, when Gardner looked like a future star. Unfortunately, he also regressed in 2013 and then even more so in 2014. That seemed largely to blame on Michigan’s offensive line, which was among the worst in the country despite having 1st and 3rd round NFL Draft picks as the bookend tackles in 2013. Some improvement occurred in 2014, but not enough and not quickly enough. Unhappiness was rumbling prior to this past season, and the calls for Hoke’s head were exacerbated by anger at then athletic director David Brandon – which seemed to be aimed at Hoke and the team at certain points – and some very questionable in-game decisions that made Hoke look overwhelmed.

I have mixed feelings about Hoke’s firing. Hoke was too often unsuccessful on the field, but he has been universally acclaimed for the relationships he builds with his players and the leadership he provided for them. Michigan improved their academic standing and generally kept players around under him, which was a huge problem during the Rodriguez administration. He liked to claim that 69 out of 69 seniors graduated during his tenure (although Frank Clark and his domestic violence situation might mar that perfect record).

Hoke also had some admirable personal traits. He was obviously elated to be hired by Michigan in 2011, saying he would have walked from San Diego to Ann Arbor. It’s hard to find major faults in someone who is that unabashedly excited to be doing his job. Furthermore, he referred to his players as “sons” and genuinely seemed interested in seeing them succeed. He usually refused to wear long sleeves on game days, presumably because he wanted to lead by example in getting players to tune out the weather. Unlike some coaches around the country who berate players on the sideline or call them out in press conferences, Hoke kept criticism behind closed doors.

Ultimately, the goal at Michigan should be to win national championships. If not, then at least Big Ten championships. If  not, then at least beat Ohio State and Michigan State. Unfortunately, Michigan never won any kind of championship under Hoke and went 2-6 against those rivals. Hoke’s time had come. It isn’t fair, but it’s the way the world works.

Wherever Hoke ends up next year or in two years, I hope that Brady, his wife, and his daughter find happiness and success. His next team will be my second-favorite team.*

*Unless it’s Ohio State or Michigan State

2Dec 2014
Uncategorized 11 comments

Coaching Candidate: Pat Narduzzi

Pat Narduzzi (image via ESPN.com)

Pat Narduzzi
Age: 
48
Current position: Michigan State defensive coordinator
Salary: $904,583 per year
Head coaching experience: None
History: Narduzzi played linebacker at Youngstown State and Rhode Island before starting a coaching career at Miami (OH). He then coached linebackers at Rhode Island, the defense at Rhode Island, linebackers at Northern Illinois, the defense at Miami (OH), the defense at Cincinnati, and then the defense at Michigan State from 2007 to the present under Mark Dantonio. He has been attached to Dantonio at the hip since 2004, and Narduzzi earned the Broyles Award in 2013 for being the top assistant coach in the country.
My thoughts: Narduzzi has said some inflammatory things about Michigan in the past, and moving to Michigan would be a bit of a slap in the face to his mentor, Dantonio. However, Narduzzi seems to be holding out for a top-flight job, and there aren’t a ton of opportunities. Last year may have been his best shot, and he might miss his window if he waits too long. He represents aggressive defense, but his offensive preference would be questionable; a run-oriented, pro-style offense would probably be his aim based on MSU’s offense over the last several years. I do not think he would fit in well with Michigan’s atmosphere, and defense is not so much of a question as offense these days.
Likelihood of coming to Michigan: If offered the job, I believe Narduzzi would take it. But with no head coaching experience and a questionable amount of influence on the defense (Dantonio was a very good defensive coordinator at one point), Narduzzi would be a B- or C-list option.

My wish list:
1. Bob Stoops
2. Les Miles
3. Greg Schiano
4. Pat Narduzzi
5. Mike Shanahan