Michigan 41, Florida 7

Michigan 41, Florida 7


January 2, 2016

Who saw that coming? Okay, maybe 8% of you saw that coming. But even a good chunk of that 8% probably didn’t think that Michigan would beat the Gators by 34 points. I don’t think most of us even believed that Michigan could score 41 points against Florida’s defense, especially given that special teams and Michigan’s defense didn’t factor into any scores or even any extremely short fields. The two turnovers Michigan forced were an interception by Channing Stribling on a fake field goal and then an interception by Jarrod Wilson in the endzone for a touchback. Michigan moved the ball methodically and in chunks, didn’t turn over the ball, and only punted once. That’s an impressive showing.

Hit the jump for the rest of the game recap.

Let’s talk about those running backs. I think there’s a reason that the offense didn’t bog down, and it had to do with the running back play. Michigan used two or three running backs (depending on how you view Sione Houma), and the two true tailbacks looked the best they have all year. De’Veon Smith (25 carries, 109 yards) was back to his bruising self, high-stepping through tackles and dragging tacklers with him. The thing that really caught my eye, though, was his vision. Especially early in the game, there were cutbacks to be found, and he actually found them. This is a new development for Smith, who runs harder than anyone else on the team but also tended to plow into his offensive linemen and 300 lb. opponents during the regular season. Meanwhile, Drake Johnson (6 carries, 58 yards) showed a little burst that seemed to be lacking during the regular season. After the game, he said that his surgically repaired knee felt better in the heat than it had in the dreary Big Ten weather. Whatever the reason, he looked good against an opponent with “SEC speed” that allowed the 14th-fewest yards per carry in the country this year.

While we’re at it, let’s see us some Sione Houma in the NFL. There’s not a bit of insincerity in me stating that I think Houma should get a chance to play somewhere in the NFL next year. I had been looking for him to take over Michigan’s fullback job for the past couple years, and for whatever reason, it didn’t happen. Joe Kerridge – a multi-year starter – was marginalized throughout the year and ceded way to the more athletic Houma. There aren’t many teams growing fullbacks these days. This one in particular had 9 carries for 32 yards and 1 touchdown on the day, which gave him 5 scores for this year. Give this man a job.

Florida took one on the chin. Maybe this has always been an issue in college football, but the rumors leading up to the game suggested that a lot of Gators didn’t want to play in the game and were looking toward the NFL. One of those NFL-bound players, Alex McCallister, got himself suspended for the game and saved himself the trouble of having to play. Another one, Demarcus Robinson, had 1 catch for 17 yards (his first catch in the last four games). A third early entry, Vernon Hargreaves III, did not have a good day; he got beat on a double-move by Jehu Chesson for a long touchdown and on a post for another long completion. Chesson is better than we all thought he was back in September, but the double-move shouldn’t have burned Hargreaves to quite such a crispy texture. Maybe it’s a difference in team culture, or maybe it’s a difference in the players Florida recruited. But the Wolverines seemed dialed in, while the Gators obviously weren’t. There’s something to be said for having the right mix of players, and Michigan has it right now. That’s partly thanks to Jim Harbaugh, but also to Brady Hoke.

Florida’s lone touchdown shouldn’t have counted. If you follow me on Twitter, you probably saw me complaining about this. If you don’t, you should be (LINK). Anyway, the rule is that any player in motion must be set for 1 full second before an additional player goes into motion. On the trick play that resulted in a score, QB Treon Harris put RB Kelvin Taylor in motion; while Taylor was in motion, Harris started walking around like he was calling an audible and communicating. The ball was snapped to Taylor, who ran left and lateraled the ball to Demarcus Robinson, who underhanded the ball to Harris in the endzone. It was a neat play design, except it was executed poorly. Unfortunately for Michigan, the referees also executed poorly. It was an obvious call and multiple officials should have identified it, but it never appeared to cross their minds.

While I’m rehashing Twitter bits. First of all, karma came around to bite Florida linebacker Jarrad Davis in the hindquarters. Early in the game, he hit Jake Rudock after a throw, but it was a fairly clean hit timed pretty well. The only issue was that while they were lying on the ground, Davis threw a forearm into the back of Rudock’s head. (There was no call, despite the fact that the head referee clearly saw the funny business and sprinted over to watch the two players get up.) Later in the game, Davis lowered his head to tackle Jake Butt. At the conclusion of the play, it almost looked as if Davis had knocked himself unconscious, or at least made himself groggy. Now, I don’t wish brain injury on anyone, but it seems that the universe had a little something special in store for Davis after his shady actions against Rudock. There’s no excuse for throwing a forearm to the back of the head of a player who’s lying face down on the ground.

More Twitter bits? In the game preview, I predicted Graham Glasgow would get called for his weekly snap infraction. He didn’t. Instead, he double-pumped on a snap (and probably should have been penalized), which resulted in a fumbled exchange that Rudock luckily fell on. I mentioned it on Twitter, and after the game, Graham Glasgow liked/favorited the Tweet. Maybe he thought it was funny. But he’s probably just adding me to his hate list. I will find a flaming bag of dog poo on my porch, and when I step outside to stomp it out, he’ll step out from the shadows and shotgun snap a bowling ball into my face.

Florida’s early defensive strategy had me scratching my head. I watched some film on Florida, but I will admit to not having watched them enough to pick out all their tendencies. However, some of their early defensive looks confused me. They seemed to have looked at some of Michigan’s tendencies and overreacted to them, leaving huge bubbles over the backside of the line. This resulted in some big gains for Smith and Johnson. I’m not sure if the formations confused the Gators or if Florida didn’t think Michigan’s running backs could crease the backside of the play, but it didn’t work out well for Florida. They did make adjustments to their fronts, and the linebackers did a better job of staying home instead of flowing too quickly over the top. But that little shot of confidence for Michigan’s runners might have given them a little extra pep in their step for the rest of the game.

Jake Rudock wasn’t the problem at Iowa. I’ve mentioned this in the past, but I always thought Rudock got a bad rap for what went down at Iowa. Some people said that he was holding Iowa’s offense back, and that C.J. Beathard was the better quarterback. What held Rudock back at Iowa was some poor play calling and a lack of talent around him. Rudock isn’t a great deal different right now than he was as a Hawkeye, but he has better coaching. He’s just the second QB in Michigan history to throw for over 3,000 yards in a season (John Navarre was the first), and that happened after he struggled for the first half of the year while adjusting to a wide receiver corps that isn’t very deep and wasn’t well established. It’s true that Beathard’s record at Iowa this year (12-2) is superior to Rudock’s at Michigan (10-3), but Rudock put up better numbers while facing tougher teams. With the idiotic way the Big Ten is set up, Iowa went undefeated in the regular season without playing three of the best teams (the three best teams?) in the conference: Michigan, Michigan State, and Ohio State. When Iowa finally faced good teams, they lost to MSU in the Big Ten Championship game and then got embarrassed by Stanford in the Rose Bowl.

What the hell happened with Jehu Chesson? Chesson went from a guy who couldn’t catch anything outside of his body to a guy who now seems to catch anything within his area code. He caught 5 passes for 118 yards and 1 touchdown in this game, and that was before he went out with an injury late in the third quarter. This game included a diving catch and one that he nearly hauled in on the sideline after leaping approximately 17 feet in the air. Maybe he just finally matured, but whether it’s coach Jedd Fisch, grad assistant Derron Montgomery, analyst/recruiting coordinator Erik Campbell, or good old-fashioned Elmer’s Glue, the development of Chesson has been astounding this year. If you take his last six games and project them over a twelve-game schedule (so not including a conference title game, bowl game, playoff game, etc.), here’s the stat line you would get: 66 catches, 1148 yards, and 18 touchdowns. That would be good for #50 in receptions, #20 in yardage, and #2 in touchdowns. Add in a couple rushing touchdowns and that kickoff return, and we’re talking about one of the most prolific scorers in the nation. (For some perspective, Boise State and Louisiana Tech each have a running back who is tied for the national lead with 26 total touchdowns.)

Harbaugh. Thank goodness he’s in Ann Arbor. This was a very good first year.

25 comments

  1. Comments: 2
    DrSkunkbear
    Jan 02, 2016 at 2:45 AM

    Do you think there’s any chance that Ruddock gets drafted? He doesn’t have a huge arm but he’s accurate, has great awareness and a decent amount of athleticism. I was thinking he might end up getting drafted late by a team willing to develop a backup. He’s certainly not any worse than Greg McElroy, and he got drafted.

    Sidenote: Iowa’s current QB certainly lived up to his namesake.

    • Comments: 3844
      Joined: 7/13/2015
      Jan 02, 2016 at 8:44 AM

      I definitely think there’s a “chance” that he gets drafted, but I don’t think it will happen. He doesn’t have prototypical size for a guy you look to draft and make your franchise QB, he doesn’t have the greatest arm strength, etc. I certainly think he will get a chance somewhere as an undrafted free agent, and he could stick on a roster. I think one thing that concerns me, though, is his trouble early in the season. It took him a while to get that timing down with his teammates, and in the NFL, you don’t have a lot of time to build that chemistry. If you can’t hit that deep ball to Jehu Chesson because you haven’t played with him for six games, then you might be back out on the street.

      • Comments: 1356
        Joined: 8/13/2015
        Roanman
        Jan 02, 2016 at 12:07 PM

        It would be big fun tho, were New England to take him in the very late rounds.

  2. Comments: 26
    Joined: 10/14/2015
    Tanisr4
    Jan 02, 2016 at 3:40 AM

    We saw what the future hold tosay michigan and the future number 2 in the division dominated while everyone else struggle badly….just imagine what’s gonna be like when Harbaugh have a qb playing for him that’s been in thr system for 2 or more years like starting next year. And Happy new years to all my wolverines.

    • Comments: 1356
      Joined: 8/13/2015
      Roanman
      Jan 02, 2016 at 8:07 AM

      I think there is nothing but good news coming out of this game, but I also think that we seriously outworked our opponent in preparing for this game. Because Jim Harbaugh is Harbaugh, we came into this game on a mission to get to ten and as such slapped around a pretty good team that didn’t prepare with the same …… lets call it fervor.

      Bowl season is big, make no mistake about it, but of the big games played over the last two days, I believe it was Clemson, Alabama and Michigan that went to work for the win. I think the rest of the schedule treated their trips like a holiday followed by a game. Especially Florida, OSU and ND.

      For all Sparty’s chirping, and as an aside the peaceful quiet in the sate of Michigan for the past 36 hours been a pleasant thing, as Coach Mike Dantonio said himself, they were real happy to be there “at the top”, knew they had enjoyed remarkable luck getting there, spent the past month congratulating themselves for all their success and were counting on the football gods and/or destiny to carry them through rather than getting themselves ready for a team like Alabama. Both OSU and Notre Dame were disappointed with their place at the table. Them goobers at Iowa went on vacation, “Look at all that water Martha! Damn, they got more water than we got corn!”. Oklahoma might have had some edge, I dunno, I paid no attention there.

      I guarantee you that all of college football took note of our game against Florida and thought to themselves, “OH yeah, Harbaugh!!! What was McElwain thinking? There is no such thing as an exhibition game to that maniac.” They won’t be making that mistake again.”

      • Comments: 522
        Joined: 8/12/2015
        DonAZ
        Jan 02, 2016 at 11:11 AM

        Re: the generally poor bowl games, and the disinterested play of some teams …

        My opinion — the playoffs is killing the other bowls, and in general is hurting college football. At least in its current 4-team format.

        Other bowls — do you remember when the NCAA basketball tournament used to play a consolation game between the losers in the Final Four? They gave that up a long time ago, and they gave it up for a very good reason: nobody cared. The players didn’t care and the fans didn’t care. When the focus is so clearly on who is #1, things like who’s #3 and #4 don’t matter at all.

        The non-playoff bowls are pretty much the same for those teams who had visions of competing for the national championship, but missed out being in the top four for the playoffs, notably: Ohio State and Notre Dame.

        I’m not a fan of the current four-team format for the playoffs. I think it is encouraging a kind of “achieve at all costs” mentality in the game that will, eventually, do great harm. If we’re going to have a playoff — and at this point we will — it should be at least 8 teams, and for the sake of eliminating argument, 16.

        But no more than 16 … there are not that many teams that have a plausible claim on running with the top programs. The current four-team format had a clearly over-matched team (MSU) in, while a conference champion (Stanford) watched from the outside. Stanford’s play yesterday suggested it was a better candidate for the playoffs than MSU or Oklahoma. But the four-team format would not allow the committee to put Stanford (a two-loss team) into the playoffs.

        Clemson vs. Alabama is a plausible championship game, however. Alabama looks very good, and Clemson is undefeated.

        Tonight I go to the Cactus Bowl to watch WVU play ASU. Go Mountaineers! 🙂

        • Comments: 6285
          Joined: 8/11/2015
          Lanknows
          Jan 02, 2016 at 7:58 PM

          A 16 team playoff would make the regular season nearly worthless and render games like OSU-MSU and even OSU-UM barely more relevant than regular season ncaa basketball games. Also a nightmare to schedule and a major imposition on the majority of players who are legitimate student-athletes with no future in pro sports.

          I like the way it is – you better win your conference to be in the conversation. And if you don’t beat some impressive opponents along the way you still might be out (e.g., Stanford, Houston)

  3. Comments: 1364
    Joined: 8/11/2015
    WindyCityBlue
    Jan 02, 2016 at 9:00 AM

    Focus, attitude and mental preparation are as important in bowl games as talent, often more so, which is the main reason there were so many unexpectedly lopsided games yesterday. Good to see that we had all of those things, when we’ve lacked them in so many past bowls. Florida was not a particularly formidable opponent, but this was our best bowl performance in a long time.

    • Comments: 6285
      Joined: 8/11/2015
      Lanknows
      Jan 02, 2016 at 8:01 PM

      I don’t get the desire by Michigan fans to minimize the teams accomplishments.

      The defense was dominant all year until it got hammered by injuries and ran into very very good spread offenses. They played Florida very well, as they should have.

      The offense wasn’t great, and fine maybe Florida wasn’t in peak form, but still – the balance exhibited against a top-ranked D with tons of NFL-caliber playing in their backyard was a major step-forward and warrants some optimism for next season.

  4. Comments: 117
    Joined: 9/28/2015
    PapaBear
    Jan 02, 2016 at 9:20 AM

    First off, I need to qualify that I did not think UM could move the ball vs. this SEC Defense! Not sure how to quantify this game? UM was focused, incredibly well coached, and quite simply better!

    SEC Speed? Lack of focus? What about Big Ten Braun? We just steam rolled them on both sides of the ball!

    Great call on mentioning Coach Hoke! He brought in high quality players and people!

  5. Comments: 183
    Joined: 9/3/2015
    suduri xusai
    Jan 02, 2016 at 9:34 AM

    Don’t know about Hoke’s role in this. His half-ass preparation was quite toxic for Michigan by 2013 and 2014. You remember how we lost to Kansas State in a half-ass fashion? If we still had Hoke, we would’ve stayed home and no bowl game

    • Comments: 117
      Joined: 9/28/2015
      PapaBear
      Jan 02, 2016 at 9:45 AM

      I agree with the preparation. I am simply referring to the fact, as Thunder does as well, that Hoke recruited high quality players.

  6. Comments: 522
    Joined: 8/12/2015
    DonAZ
    Jan 02, 2016 at 10:26 AM

    I’m happy to see Sione Houma get some love … when he came in as a freshman I decided to keep an eye on him. Not much to show for it pre-Harbaugh. But the current staff clearly saw something in Houma and tapped into it. Good for Houma.

    I’m going to guess focus and preparation accounts for most of the differential in that game. Michigan wanted it; Florida seemed not to care. Next year will be an interesting one for McElwain at Florida.

    For the life of me I do not know why Florida pitched the ball for their TD. The replay showed nothing but green for the guy with the ball … he could have walked that in himself. Yet he decided to underhand flip the ball to the player in the endzone, and it wasn’t a very good underhand flip at that. It makes me wonder if it’s indicative of a general trait in McElwain for the trick plays rather than the more lunch-pail attitude of a coach like Harbaugh or Saban.

    A very good first year for Harbaugh and Michigan. The message could not be more clear — Michigan is a football program where those who work hard and achieve can succeed. Recruits with a similar outlook on life should find Michigan a compelling destination.

    When is spring ball? 🙂

  7. Comments: 21
    Joined: 8/31/2015
    coyote57
    Jan 02, 2016 at 10:36 AM

    Overall, a satisfying conclusion to a better than expected season. Great way to send out the Seniors.

    I kinda expected to see Higdon in the 4th Q, since he’d burned his RS already.
    Nice to see Bunting getting in there.
    Kinda thinking Green and Isaac are gone after this. Maybe not?

    Surely this will pay off in recruiting some of those last few top recruits out there. (tho you never know where a 17 -18 yr old’s head is)

  8. Comments: 142
    Joined: 8/12/2015
    coachernie
    Jan 02, 2016 at 12:02 PM

    After re watching the game I came to this conclusion.

    Florida played us to a draw in the first half and if not for poor QB play may have actually got the better of us, They gave up in the second half after a couple scoring drives by us. That’s on the Florida coaching staff.

    Kalis was exposed once again for lack of flexibility and a failure to be mobile. He can’t block anyone who can move in any form or fashion. Would have liked to see Dawson, Newsome or JBB get some work.

    Rudock reminds me of Brady, not particular great in anyone area but smart and is just a gamer/ winner. I think everyone under estimates him, like they did Brady coming out of college. He will stick in the big league for awhile.

    • Comments: 3844
      Joined: 7/13/2015
      Jan 02, 2016 at 12:08 PM

      Dawson has looked worse than Kalis, and Bushell-Beatty is a project. I like Newsome, but I think he’s more of a tackle, and I don’t think a true freshman would be an upgrade over Kalis. Also, Kalis had a tough matchup against some of the better defensive tackles in the country (Brantley, Bullard). Not too many guys in the country are going to have a great day against those guys.

    • Comments: 6285
      Joined: 8/11/2015
      Lanknows
      Jan 02, 2016 at 8:05 PM

      Kalis has been a disappointment but that Bullard kid is supposed to be a 1st round NFL player. Probably a good thing for next year that he knows where the bar is to be great his last year at Michigan.

      Expect major improvement in the OL next year. Saw it in pass protection this year (compared to last year). Will see it in run-blocking next year (compared to this year).

  9. Comments: 6285
    Joined: 8/11/2015
    Lanknows
    Jan 02, 2016 at 7:51 PM

    Hear hear to Harbaugh. I predicted 10 wins before the year, though I thought we’d beat Utah and MSU (almost happened) but stumble somewhere else around the way (almost happened vs Indiana and Minnesota). Other than a more competitive match against OSU and one play against MSU, you can’t really ask much more of Harbaugh.

    It’s tough not to start thinking about next year given how good the defense looked most of the year and how improved the offense looked in the bowl. The QB situation looms large, but with an improved run game and our top 3 receiving targets all back, the job should be a lot easier than it was this year.

    Chesson was always regarded as physically gifted but raw. Kudos to Harbaugh/Fisch/Drevno for getting him the ball on all those reverses early in the year. That helped the faltering run game out by spreading defenses horizontally and got us through until Rudock was able to improve. Once he did…

    I was ready to hop on the CHESSON FOR HEISMAN train after that roasting of Hargraves, but as much as it was a good move (which it was) it was also a great pump fake and Hargraves bit hard to try to get an INT. Regardless, he’s been getting open all year deep, dangerous on kick returns and reverses, and just an all around threat.

    I do think Soup Campbell probably contributed to how much better our WRs looked as the year progressed.

    Agree about Houma. Not sure what else anyone would be looking for in a FB. It took a full 4 years but he reached his potential and became what we hoped he’d be. It’s hard not to wish he had been red-shirted given the overlap with Kerridge but that’s how things go sometimes.

    Funny about Glasgow on twitter.

    Questions:

    I don’t get the gripe about the Florida TD. So is the problem that Harris should be considered to be in motion (because the ball wasn’t snapped to him)? Or was it just that Taylor wasn’t set before Harris moved? The replay doesn’t show any issue as far as I can tell and I didn’t notice it in real time.

    What is wrong with the Big Ten scheduling and how should it be done differently?

    • Comments: 3844
      Joined: 7/13/2015
      Jan 02, 2016 at 9:32 PM

      The problem with Florida’s TD is that he and Taylor were in motion at the same time. Imagine watching Rudock put Poggi and Butt in motion across the formation where Poggi stops to get in his three-point stance but Butt keeps running out to the slot without stopping and the ball is snapped while he’s still in motion. It would be an illegal shift, and Michigan would be penalized 5 yards. The only difference is that in Florida’s case, the QB was the guy still in motion.

      There’s no fix for the Big Ten schedule. It’s screwed. But this is what happens when you expand conferences to 14 teams. It’s stupid that teams don’t play each other. Then you get cases like Iowa’s where they don’t play anybody good. And they could have lucked into the playoff if they had sneaked past MSU in the Big Ten championship. With as badly as they were beaten by Stanford, imagine their competitiveness against Clemson or Alabama.

      • Comments: 6285
        Joined: 8/11/2015
        Lanknows
        Jan 03, 2016 at 12:50 PM

        You’re probably technically correct but I suspect this sort of thing is let go all the time (a guy still completing his motion/getting set while the QB starts yelling out play-call adjustments/audibles). For Michigan and everyone else.

        In other words, I think a QB is given more leaway to move around because he’s not “in motion” in a conventional sense that an eligible receiver/back/end is. And yeah, Harris was used as an eligible receiver on that play, but the refs didn’t know that at the time.

        If anyone actually called a QB for motion in this case I think it would elicit a lot of groans from fans.

        • Comments: 3844
          Joined: 7/13/2015
          Jan 03, 2016 at 1:00 PM

          I disagree. Plays like this are run, but the difference here is that Taylor went in motion. It doesn’t matter that Harris was used as an eligible receiver. Even if Taylor took the snap and fell to the ground immediately to run out the clock, it would still be illegal motion. And anyone who would groan about it would simply be guilty of not understanding the rules.

          • Comments: 6285
            Joined: 8/11/2015
            Lanknows
            Jan 03, 2016 at 1:04 PM

            Don’t you think it happens all the time that the QB is moving around the pocket presnap while someone else (WR, TE, etc.) is still not fully set?

            • Comments: 3844
              Joined: 7/13/2015
              Jan 03, 2016 at 1:06 PM

              No, I don’t. And I’ve seen high school teams (including mine) called for the QB even taking one step while someone else is in motion. It’s illegal. It should have been called, and it’s an obvious call (unlike, say, holding, which can be camouflaged or lost in the shuffle of bodies).

      • Comments: 6285
        Joined: 8/11/2015
        Lanknows
        Jan 03, 2016 at 1:02 PM

        On conferences: I think it’s how you look at it.

        We aren’t REALLY in the same conference as Wisconsin, Indiana and all those guys anymore. We’re two separate conferences with a loose affiliation — agreeing to play 3 games/year for each team.

        The “Big Ten Championship” is effectively a playoff game between the two loosely affiliated sets of teams.

        My qualm is that they haven’t gone far enough. The “power 5” would do well to consolidate into a “power 4”, with each conference having 16 teams/ 8 per division.

        That would give us functionally an 8-team playoff, or as close as is reasonably possible to avoid major controversies and misjustices. It would also keep one of the best things about college football (the importance of regular season conference games/rivalries) wholly in-tact.

        • Comments: 3844
          Joined: 7/13/2015
          Jan 03, 2016 at 1:04 PM

          I might not care much if they used that strategy and made a 16- or 18-team conference. But right now, the 14-team conference is stupid.

You must belogged in to post a comment.